NASA’s Perseverance Rover Breaks the Off-World Driving Record, Passing 28 Miles on Mars

Perseverance has now driven farther than any vehicle on another world, passing Opportunity’s record in about a third of the time. Self-driving software did most of the work.
HomeNewsTwo U.S. Economists Win the Nobel for the Ideas Behind How the...

Two U.S. Economists Win the Nobel for the Ideas Behind How the Fed Fights Recessions

Two American economists whose ideas sit behind how central banks fight recessions and inflation have won the 2026 Nobel Prize in economics.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on Monday awarded the prize to Robert E. Hall of Stanford University and Michael Woodford of Columbia University “for the microeconomic foundations of macroeconomic stabilization.” They will split 12 million Swedish kronor, about $1.2 million.

In plain terms: the pair helped build the models that policymakers now use to figure out how interest rates and government spending can smooth out the economy’s booms and busts.

Why Their Work Mattered

The story starts in the 1970s. When the oil crises hit, the Keynesian models that governments had relied on to manage recessions stopped giving useful answers. Those models leaned heavily on statistical relationships between big numbers such as inflation, output and consumer spending, and those relationships broke down.

Hall and Woodford took a different route. Instead of starting from economy-wide averages, they built models from the ground up, based on how individual households and businesses actually make decisions, and then added those choices together. According to the academy, that gave policymakers a sturdier way to judge which responses to a shock would work best.

“With them, we are better equipped to deal with shocks in the economy, such as energy crises,” said John Hassler, who chairs the prize committee. He said their work provides a stable theoretical foundation for models now used by central banks and governments around the world.

Who Are the Winners?

Robert E. Hall

Hall, born in 1943 in Palo Alto, California, is an economics professor at Stanford and a senior fellow at the university’s Hoover Institution. His research looks at how households decide how much to spend or save based on their income and what they expect about the future.

His best-known paper, from 1978, argued that if people plan sensibly, their spending should change only when something surprising happens to their income. Expected raises are already baked in; it’s the unexpected news that moves the needle.

Americans may know his work without knowing his name. Since 1978, Hall has chaired the National Bureau of Economic Research’s Business Cycle Dating Committee, the group that officially decides when U.S. recessions begin and end. He also co-designed the Hall–Rabushka flat tax with Alvin Rabushka.

Michael Woodford

Woodford is the John Bates Clark Professor of Political Economy at Columbia. His book Interest and Prices is a standard reference on how monetary policy works, and he co-edited The Inflation Targeting Debate with Ben S. Bernanke.

He is closely tied to “forward guidance”: the idea that a central bank can shape the economy not just by changing interest rates today but by signaling where it expects rates to go. Woodford has described the approach as “making more explicit statements about the likely future path of interest rate policy.”

What It Means for You

Nobel-winning theory can feel far removed from a household budget, but these ideas show up in everyday financial news. A few examples:

  • Fed meetings move markets even when rates don’t change. Forward guidance is the reason the wording of a Fed statement can matter as much as the rate decision itself. Expectations about future rates feed into what lenders charge now.
  • Your expectations are part of the model. Hall’s work treats people as forward-looking. That’s why economists and the Fed pay close attention to surveys of how consumers feel about prices and jobs, like the recent slide in consumer sentiment.
  • “Recession” has an official referee. When you hear that a downturn has been formally dated, that call comes from the committee Hall has long led.

None of this means the models are perfect. Economists still argue over how well they handle sudden crises, and stabilization policy remains a judgment call. The committee’s point is narrower: these laureates gave policymakers better tools for making that call.

About the Prize

The economics prize, formally the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, was created by Sweden’s central bank and has been awarded since 1969. It isn’t one of the five original prizes in Alfred Nobel’s will. Monday’s award was the last of this year’s announcements, following prizes in medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peace.

Last year’s economics prize went to Joel Mokyr, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt for their work on “creative destruction.”

More on Contoh

Sources